{"created":"2023-06-19T07:36:04.741385+00:00","id":1965,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"03fa5bc3-932f-436c-be3b-69417a6420dc"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"1965","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1965"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:mejiro.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001965","sets":["1:17:158"]},"author_link":["4889","4890"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2023-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"19","bibliographicPageEnd":"78","bibliographicPageStart":"67","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"目白大学心理学研究"},{"bibliographic_title":"Mejiro Journal of Psychology","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本研究では，証人出廷時の鑑定人に対する信用性に影響を及ぼす要因を模索することを目的として，インターネットによるパネル調査を実施した（588名の男性，459名の女性，平均値44.7歳（標準偏差9.60））。調査に際しては，ある殺人事件の仮想裁判に裁判員として参加し，「DNA型鑑定」あるいは「ポリグラフ検査」を行った鑑定人がこの裁判に証人出廷するといったシナリオを想定して実施した。調査対象者は，いずれかの鑑定群に割り振られ，鑑定人が有する特徴30項目に対してどの程度信用できるか信用性の評価をもとめた。探索的因子分析（EFA）の結果によると，両群ともに2つの因子（「熟練度」因子と「覚束なさ」因子）が抽出された。「熟練度」因子は，「鑑定経験年数が10年程度である」，「今までに1,000件程度の鑑定経験がある」といった観測変数の背景となりうる因子である。それに対して，「覚束なさ」因子とは，「見た目に清潔感がない」，「下を向いて話す」などの観測変数に関連する因子である。さらに，多母集団同時分析（MGA）を実施したところ，「DNA型鑑定」群と「ポリグラフ検査」群の間に，因子平均のみ違いがみられ，鑑定種別による信用性の違いを示唆した。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"This study investigated factors affecting the credibility of expert witnesses through an Internet-based, self-administered questionnaire survey. Respondents were 588 men and 459 women (Mean Age = 44.7 years, SD = 9.60). This study assumed the respondents were participating in a murder trial as lay judges and divided into either two scenario groups: One group read an explanation that a “DNA test\" has been conducted in the case while the other to a “Polygraph test\". A questionnaire was composed of 30 items on the expert witness's characteristics. The credibility in each item were rated by respondents in both groups. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) extracted two factors: the expert witness's “Skill level\" and “Uncertainty\". The Skill level formed the background to “ten years as a career\" and “made a thousand cases until today\", amongst others. By contrast, the Uncertainty factor was related to “not neat and tidy\" and “looking down while explaining\", amongst others. Furthermore, multiple-group analysis (MGA) indicated only a difference in factor means between the DNA and Polygraph test groups.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"目白大学"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"目白大学"}]},"item_10002_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12059174","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1349-7103","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"財津, 亘"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"4889","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"ZAITSU, Wataru","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"4890","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2023-04-19"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"MJP_19_67.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.0 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"MJP_19_67.pdf","url":"https://mejiro.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1965/files/MJP_19_67.pdf"},"version_id":"6ef5c130-f1fd-435d-ad56-643d41a54ff4"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"鑑定人","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"信用性","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"インターネットによる調査","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"探索的因子分析","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"多母集団同時分析","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"expert witness","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"credibility","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"internet questionnaire survey","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"exploratory factor analysis (EFA)","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"multiple-group analysis (MGA)","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"鑑定人の信用性に影響を及ぼす要因の検討","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"鑑定人の信用性に影響を及ぼす要因の検討"},{"subitem_title":"Factors affecting expert witness’ credibility","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"3","path":["158"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2023-04-19"},"publish_date":"2023-04-19","publish_status":"0","recid":"1965","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["鑑定人の信用性に影響を及ぼす要因の検討"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":3},"updated":"2023-06-19T07:42:28.644247+00:00"}